Federal drug laws develop a labeling problem. When you hear the term "drug trafficker," you may think about Pablo Escobar or Walter White, but the truth is that under federal law, drug traffickers include individuals who buy pseudo-ephedrine for their methamphetamine dealership; serve as intermediary in a series of little transactions; and even pick up a travel suitcase for the wrong good friend. Thanks to conspiracy laws, everyone on the totem pole can be subject to the very same severe mandatory minimum sentences.
To the men and females who prepared our federal drug laws in 1986, this might come as a surprise. According to Sen. Robert Byrd, cosponsor of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, the reason to connect five- and ten-year compulsory sentences to drug trafficking was to punish "the kingpins-- the masterminds who are actually running these operations", and the mid-level dealerships.
Fast forward twenty-five years. Today, almost everybody convicted of a federal drug criminal activity is convicted of "drug trafficking", which more often than not leads to at least a 5- or ten-year obligatory jail sentence. That's a lot of time in federal jail for lots of people who are minor parts of drug trade, the vast bulk of whom are men and women of color.
This is the system that federal district Judge Mark Bennett sees every day. Judge Bennett sits on the district court in northern Iowa, and he handles a lot of drug cases., I would have sent out 1,092 of my fellow people to federal prison for compulsory minimum sentences ranging from sixty months to life without the possibility of release.
The numbers can't communicate the absurd tragedy of it all. This is how he explains a recent drug trafficking case:
I just recently sentenced a group of more than twenty offenders on meth trafficking conspiracy charges. Eighteen were 'tablet smurfers,' as federal prosecutors put it, meaning their role amounted to frequently purchasing and providing cold medication to meth cookers in exchange for very small, low-grade quantities to feed their serious addictions. All of them faced mandatory minimum sentences of sixty or 120 months.
There is information to recommend that Judge Bennett's experience is not uncharacteristic. In 2007, the U.S. Sentencing Commission compiled considerable information on drug and crack sentencing. They found that in 2005, most of the lowest-level drug- and crack-trafficking offenders-- men and women described as "street-level dealerships", "couriers/mules", and "renter/loader/lookout/ enabler/users"-- got five- or ten-year obligatory prison sentences. This is specifically real for crack-cocaine defendants, most of whom are black; in spite of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, offering a small quantity of fracture cocaine (28 grams) carries the exact same necessary minimum sentence-- 5 years-- as selling 500 grams of powder cocaine.
This is the truth for which proponents of severe federal drug laws should account. We can not pretend that heavy sentences for ladies like Kemba Smith and males like Jamel Dossie are the fluke errors of overboard laws. We must admit that our sentencing of minor individuals in the drug trade to prison terms indicated for the leaders of big drug companies-- as a common occurrence, not as an exception. As a result, we needlessly lock up great deals of small transgressors for long periods. Judge Bennett decries the human costs of these sentences:
If prolonged mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug addicts actually worked, one might be able to rationalize them. But there is no proof that they do. I have actually seen how they leave numerous countless young kids parent-less and thousands of aging, infirm and dying parents childless. They destroy families and mightily sustain the cycle of hardship and dependency.
Here, once again, we have evidence that Judge Bennett is right: long obligatory sentences are unnecessary for many drug wrongdoers. In 2002 and 2003, Michigan and New York City rescinded compulsory sentences for drug transgressors and offered judges the power to enforce much shorter sentences, probation, or drug treatment. The sky didn't fall, but crime rates did. So did prison costs.
For years, Judge Bennett has actually seen www.criminallawyerslasvegas.com/drug-conspiracy-defense-las-vegas a system that does not make good sense. He has actually seen compulsory laws composed for the most severe, massive drug dealers applied to the men and females on the most affordable rungs of the drug trade, and he has actually seen it take place a lot. We as soon as envisioned that extreme compulsory sentences would be utilized to handle the leaders of big drug operations. It's time our federal drug laws were fit to individuals that they actually target.
If you have been charged with a drug related offense and need qualified representation, contact us to discuss your case.
Contact:
Mace Yampolsky & Associates
625 S 6th St.
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 385-9777